Evaluating the suitability of myriad investment options, each with different risk and reward profiles, and how each will interact within the portfolio can be intimidating.
Trustees are expected to understand, and increasingly implement, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investment strategies despite divergent ESG perspectives among beneficiaries, conflicting ESG frameworks, and inconclusive data regarding ESG investment returns.
Monitoring, evaluating, and periodically replacing investment managers requires comprehensive systems and processes and a specialized skill set.
Scaling an independent fiduciary practice, in the face of intense competition from well-established and well-funded trust companies is a formidable competitive challenge.